> "???? 7 July" was not sent in a "hey you slack lot, stir your stumps"
> kind of way, but just a gentle sort of "keep us posted, Please" sort
> of way. If Marian and Colin can't tell the difference between
> aggressive and friendly question marks I really don't know what
> to say, except, possibly: !!!!! :)
>
>
> Marian Petrides wrote:
>> OK, gang. I'm as eager as the rest of you, but how about we cut
>> the RunRev team a little slack here. Personally, I'd prefer to get
>> a beta without known problems rather than a beta on-time that will
>> need replacement in a day or two because there are known problems
>> that couldn't get addressed prior to release.
>>
>> My 2 cents.
>>
>> Marian
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>>>
>>>> ???? 7 July
>>>
>>> Up to the end of today would still be "early next week". After
>>> that it becomes "middle of next week". But I suppose it's best to
>>> have a version that runs ok!
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-revolution mailing list
>>>
[hidden email]
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>> subscription preferences:
>>>
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>>
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
>
[hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
>
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolutionPlease visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: