JAMA defunct and replaced by Apache Commons-Math?

4 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Hassan Siddiqui

JAMA defunct and replaced by Apache Commons-Math?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I understand from the following javadoc:

http://commons.apache.org/math/api-2.0/org/apache/commons/math/linear/LUDecomposition.html

that JAMA is now defunct.

Can you confirm this? Is Commons-Math a complete replacement for JAMA now?


================================================================================================
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The
unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content
is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please delete it from your system and notify
the sender. E-mails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. ESA shall not be liable
for any e-mail if modified.
=================================================================================================


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Phil Steitz

Re: JAMA defunct and replaced by Apache Commons-Math?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hassan Siddiqui wrote:
> I understand from the following javadoc:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/math/api-2.0/org/apache/commons/math/linear/LUDecomposition.html
>
>
> that JAMA is now defunct.
>
> Can you confirm this? Is Commons-Math a complete replacement for JAMA now?

To our knowledge, JAMA is not under active development at this time.
 The word "defunct" is perhaps a bit strong.

Commons-math is not a complete replacement for JAMA.

Phil

>
>
> ================================================================================================
>
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
> addressee or addressees only. The
> unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
> or in part) of its content
> is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please delete it
> from your system and notify
> the sender. E-mails can be altered and their integrity cannot be
> guaranteed. ESA shall not be liable
> for any e-mail if modified.
> =================================================================================================
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Ted Dunning

Re: JAMA defunct and replaced by Apache Commons-Math?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
But it adds considerable functionality that JAMA did not have and is under
active development.

JAMA was a proof of concept for various API structuring ideas.  Commons math
is about producing production quality software.  JAMA was a one-time project
and is long since frozen (although it is public domain so you can fork it to
your heart's content).  Commons math is an ongoing, vital project that you
can influence and contribute to.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Phil Steitz <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Commons-math is not a complete replacement for JAMA.




--
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve
Luc Maisonobe

Re: JAMA defunct and replaced by Apache Commons-Math?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Ted Dunning a écrit :

> But it adds considerable functionality that JAMA did not have and is under
> active development.
>
> JAMA was a proof of concept for various API structuring ideas.  Commons math
> is about producing production quality software.  JAMA was a one-time project
> and is long since frozen (although it is public domain so you can fork it to
> your heart's content).  Commons math is an ongoing, vital project that you
> can influence and contribute to.
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Phil Steitz <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Commons-math is not a complete replacement for JAMA.

The one thing commons-math does not provide yet is eigen decomposition
for non symetrical matrices (it provides this decomposition for
symetrical matrices though).

The algorithms that are in both commons-math and JAMA (LU decomposition,
QR decomposition, SVD, matrix operations ...) are often much faster in
commons-math than in JAMA.

Commons-math also provides many features JAMA did not provide.

Luc

>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]