JVM survey

13 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Scott Battaglia-2

JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Curtis Garman

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
We are on 1.6

Curtis

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Scott Battaglia
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client
> for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a
> feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece
> now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on
> Java 1.5.
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as:
> [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user



--
Curtis Garman
Web Programmer
Heartland Community College

--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Gustavo Hartmann

RE: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

We use 1.6

 


From: Scott Battaglia [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: 22 October 2009 16:35
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [cas-user] JVM survey

 

Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Vitty, Paul

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
1.6 here too

Thanks
Paul Vitty

Apache/MySQL Web Platform Engineer
Application Platform Delivery
Information Services Directorate
University of Ulster

Tel: 02890 366273
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://www.ulster.ac.uk/staff/p.vitty.html

On 22 Oct 2009, at 16:35, Scott Battaglia wrote:

> Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS
> Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.
> However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via
> memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its
> okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user


This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information which is covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager at [hidden email]. The University's computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes.

--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Robert Oschwald

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
1.5 and 1.6 here.

Robert

>
> On 22 Oct 2009, at 16:35, Scott Battaglia wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS
>> Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.
>> However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via
>> memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its
>> okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.


--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Diego Benedicto

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
1.6

Regards,
Diego
Scott Battaglia-2 wrote:
Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client
for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a
feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece
now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on
Java 1.5.

Cheers,
Scott

--
You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as: lists+1256011226062-255676@n4.nabble.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Marvin Addison

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
1.5 now, but likely 1.6 in the near future.

M

--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Scott Battaglia-2

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Everyone, thanks for your responses.  It looks like we're then safe to say that 3.1.20 (the next release) could consistently compile to 1.5 code (whereas now, some of it requires 1.5 and some 1.4).

Thanks
Scott


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Marvin Addison <[hidden email]> wrote:
1.5 now, but likely 1.6 in the near future.

M

--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
bmelloni

RE:JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
Some javascript/style in this post has been disabled (why?)

Using 1.6


From: Scott Battaglia [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: 22 October 2009 16:35
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [cas-user] JVM survey

 

Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 

You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]

To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Sandor Nemeth

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Scott Battaglia-2
Hi,

we're using 1.6 too.

Regards,
Sandor Nemeth


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Scott Battaglia <[hidden email]> wrote:
Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.  However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Giuseppe Sollazzo-2

Re: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
1.6 here too

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Scott Battaglia
> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The
>     CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.
>     However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage
>     via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if
>     its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Scott
>
>     --
>     You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> as: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>
>     To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user


--
Giuseppe Sollazzo
Systems Developer / Administrator

Computing Services
St. George's, University of London


--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Jacquet, Frederic

RE: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Same here

-----Original Message-----
From: Giuseppe Sollazzo [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: lundi, 26. octobre 2009 14:21
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [cas-user] JVM survey

1.6 here too

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Scott Battaglia
> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The
>     CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.
>     However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage
>     via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if
>     its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Scott
>
>     --
>     You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> as: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>
>     To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user


--
Giuseppe Sollazzo
Systems Developer / Administrator

Computing Services
St. George's, University of London


--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
Fredrik Norrström

RE: JVM survey

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
1.5, moving to 1.6.

Cheers,
/Fredrik

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:24 +0100, Jacquet, Frederic wrote:

> Same here
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuseppe Sollazzo [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: lundi, 26. octobre 2009 14:21
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [cas-user] JVM survey
>
> 1.6 here too
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Scott Battaglia
> > <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Out of curiosity, is anyone still relying on the Java 1.4?  The
> >     CAS Client for Java has been compatible with it for a while now.
> >     However, we added a feature to support distributed proxy storage
> >     via memcached and so one piece now requires 1.5.  I'm curious if
> >     its okay to make the entire thing rely on Java 1.5.
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >     Scott
> >
> >     --
> >     You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> as: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
> >
> >     To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> >
> >
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>
> --
> Giuseppe Sollazzo
> Systems Developer / Administrator
>
> Computing Services
> St. George's, University of London
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user


--
You are currently subscribed to [hidden email] as: [hidden email]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user