Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

21 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
1 2
Jeff Shanab

Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began by testing if a dirty
> car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on the assumption of a
> dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on a golf ball break up
> the airflow and result in better aerodynamics).  Well the dirty car got
> poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was busted.  BUT then they created a
> car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot like that of a golf ball
> (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it improved gas mileage by
> 11% over a smooth surface on the same car.  Here's a link:
>
> http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
>
> For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making body panels with a
> dimpled surface could potentially improve range.  Doing it on the sheet
> metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult to do (as they
> explained in the episode).  They used a clay material added to the outside
> of the car for the test.

I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular speed or narrow
speed range.
And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.

In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a blower box
with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance beam where
you could put two shapes
You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the airflow for
each air stream.
One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls at various air
speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent, they took
one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a scratch awl.
At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As speed was
increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and the drag was
considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back to being worse
again.

The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the rear of both
spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling tufts of air
like ball bearings and they also created little low pressure areas
behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back side of the ball
and reduce the separation.


_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Bill Dube

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Actually, it works for a very wide range of speeds.

You trip the boundary layer a bit early on purpose. At slower speeds,
this is"'just in time" and at higher speeds it is a bit early, but no
big deal. At very slow speeds, the aero drag is so small it hardly matters.

Bill Dube'

.

>I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular speed or narrow
>speed range.
>And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

dave cover-2

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I was thinking of making fiberglass "hubcaps" for my car, but very
flat and covering most of the wheel. (Brake cooling may suffer.) The
intention being to improve aerodynamics. If that worked, how about
dimpling the surface like a golf ball? Does the dimple size depend on
what speed you plan on averaging? The dimples on the Mythbusters car
were quite large compared to a golf balls dimples. Anyone know of any
dimple research projects?

Dave Cover

PS, Myers Motors used to dimple parts of their bodywork, seems to be
missing on the NMG2.

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Bill Dube <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Actually, it works for a very wide range of speeds.
>
> You trip the boundary layer a bit early on purpose. At slower speeds,
> this is"'just in time" and at higher speeds it is a bit early, but no
> big deal. At very slow speeds, the aero drag is so small it hardly matters.
>
> Bill Dube'
>
> .
>
>>I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular speed or narrow
>>speed range.
>>And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.evalbum.com/2149

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Roland Wiench

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
No research is required or maybe on your car for placement of panels in the
correct positions.

Many race cars use a exposed carbon fiber weave panels that is just clear
coated over many different size weave patterns.

Look at the new ZR1 race Corvette, it has the expose carbon fiber weave just
on the hard top which is use to reduce drag.

Roland


----- Original Message -----
From: "dave cover" <[hidden email]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics


 I was thinking of making fiberglass "hubcaps" for my car, but very
 flat and covering most of the wheel. (Brake cooling may suffer.) The
 intention being to improve aerodynamics. If that worked, how about
 dimpling the surface like a golf ball? Does the dimple size depend on
 what speed you plan on averaging? The dimples on the Mythbusters car
 were quite large compared to a golf balls dimples. Anyone know of any
 dimple research projects?

 Dave Cover
 

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Steve Adams-9

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Started racing aluminum canoes in the early sixties.  Believed that a good
wax job would fill the porosity of the metal allowing a bit more speed.
>From there we began to build our own wood fiberglass canoes and gave them a
good waxing.  Eventually moved on to silicon, believing it provided a bit
more slip in the water.  The current hulls are composite materials.  Then we
heard about the sailboat fellows trying a light sanding with wet/dry
sandpaper.  From there we heard that they were experimenting with a dimpled
surface.  The theory was that the water adhered to the surface allowing
water to slip on water instead of water against the hull.  These type of
hulls were doing better over their competitors.. No idea what the current
design for sailboat hulls use now.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roland Wiench" <[hidden email]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics


> No research is required or maybe on your car for placement of panels in
> the correct positions.
>
> Many race cars use a exposed carbon fiber weave panels that is just clear
> coated over many different size weave patterns.
>
> Look at the new ZR1 race Corvette, it has the expose carbon fiber weave
> just on the hard top which is use to reduce drag.
>
> Roland
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dave cover" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>
>
> I was thinking of making fiberglass "hubcaps" for my car, but very
> flat and covering most of the wheel. (Brake cooling may suffer.) The
> intention being to improve aerodynamics. If that worked, how about
> dimpling the surface like a golf ball? Does the dimple size depend on
> what speed you plan on averaging? The dimples on the Mythbusters car
> were quite large compared to a golf balls dimples. Anyone know of any
> dimple research projects?
>
> Dave Cover
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

dale henderson-2

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jeff Shanab
i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt effientcy.  so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and smaller holes?

harry

Albuquerque, NM
current bike:  http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
current non-bike: http://evalbum.com/1581


--- On Thu, 10/22/09, Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [EVDL]  Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:39 PM
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began
> by testing if a dirty
> > car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on
> the assumption of a
> > dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on
> a golf ball break up
> > the airflow and result in better aerodynamics). 
> Well the dirty car got
> > poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was
> busted.  BUT then they created a
> > car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot
> like that of a golf ball
> > (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it
> improved gas mileage by
> > 11% over a smooth surface on the same car. 
> Here's a link:
> >
> > http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
> >
> > For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making
> body panels with a
> > dimpled surface could potentially improve range. 
> Doing it on the sheet
> > metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult
> to do (as they
> > explained in the episode).  They used a clay
> material added to the outside
> > of the car for the test.
>
> I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular
> speed or narrow
> speed range.
> And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>
> In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a
> blower box
> with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance
> beam where
> you could put two shapes
> You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the
> airflow for
> each air stream.
> One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls
> at various air
> speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent,
> they took
> one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a
> scratch awl.
> At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As
> speed was
> increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and
> the drag was
> considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back
> to being worse
> again.
>
> The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the
> rear of both
> spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
> The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling
> tufts of air
> like ball bearings and they also created little low
> pressure areas
> behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back
> side of the ball
> and reduce the separation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>


     

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Roland Wiench

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Here is a material at:   http:www.uscomposites.com/carbonpage.html  in a
certain weave size that is apply to race cars.  NASCARs have this material
right behind the rear window.  GT Group 7 cars will have the entire top
cover with this material which is just clear coated.

Jet fighters may have the under surfaces of the rear elevators made out of
this material which is only coated with a de-gloss resin.

The size of the carbon fiber looks like in the 17 oz size.

Roland






----- Original Message -----
From: "dale henderson" <[hidden email]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics


i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt
effientcy.  so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and
smaller holes?

harry

Albuquerque, NM
current bike:  http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
current non-bike: http://evalbum.com/1581


--- On Thu, 10/22/09, Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [EVDL]  Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:39 PM
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began
> by testing if a dirty
> > car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on
> the assumption of a
> > dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on
> a golf ball break up
> > the airflow and result in better aerodynamics).
> Well the dirty car got
> > poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was
> busted. BUT then they created a
> > car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot
> like that of a golf ball
> > (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it
> improved gas mileage by
> > 11% over a smooth surface on the same car.
> Here's a link:
> >
> > http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
> >
> > For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making
> body panels with a
> > dimpled surface could potentially improve range.
> Doing it on the sheet
> > metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult
> to do (as they
> > explained in the episode). They used a clay
> material added to the outside
> > of the car for the test.
>
> I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular
> speed or narrow
> speed range.
> And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>
> In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a
> blower box
> with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance
> beam where
> you could put two shapes
> You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the
> airflow for
> each air stream.
> One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls
> at various air
> speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent,
> they took
> one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a
> scratch awl.
> At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As
> speed was
> increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and
> the drag was
> considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back
> to being worse
> again.
>
> The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the
> rear of both
> spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
> The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling
> tufts of air
> like ball bearings and they also created little low
> pressure areas
> behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back
> side of the ball
> and reduce the separation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>




_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev 

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

dave cover-2

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
So how would you apply this to a surface to maintain the correct
"roughness" and yet have a durable surface? If you applied it like
regular fiberglass, wouldn't you end up smoothing it out? Don't know
but I want to. Jerry?

Dave Cover

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Roland Wiench <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Here is a material at:   http:www.uscomposites.com/carbonpage.html  in a
> certain weave size that is apply to race cars.  NASCARs have this material
> right behind the rear window.  GT Group 7 cars will have the entire top
> cover with this material which is just clear coated.
>
> Jet fighters may have the under surfaces of the rear elevators made out of
> this material which is only coated with a de-gloss resin.
>
> The size of the carbon fiber looks like in the 17 oz size.
>
> Roland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dale henderson" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>
>
> i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt
> effientcy.  so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and
> smaller holes?
>
> harry
>
> Albuquerque, NM
> current bike:  http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
> current non-bike: http://evalbum.com/1581
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/22/09, Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: [EVDL]  Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:39 PM
>> >
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began
>> by testing if a dirty
>> > car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on
>> the assumption of a
>> > dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on
>> a golf ball break up
>> > the airflow and result in better aerodynamics).
>> Well the dirty car got
>> > poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was
>> busted. BUT then they created a
>> > car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot
>> like that of a golf ball
>> > (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it
>> improved gas mileage by
>> > 11% over a smooth surface on the same car.
>> Here's a link:
>> >
>> > http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
>> >
>> > For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making
>> body panels with a
>> > dimpled surface could potentially improve range.
>> Doing it on the sheet
>> > metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult
>> to do (as they
>> > explained in the episode). They used a clay
>> material added to the outside
>> > of the car for the test.
>>
>> I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular
>> speed or narrow
>> speed range.
>> And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>>
>> In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a
>> blower box
>> with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance
>> beam where
>> you could put two shapes
>> You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the
>> airflow for
>> each air stream.
>> One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls
>> at various air
>> speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent,
>> they took
>> one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a
>> scratch awl.
>> At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As
>> speed was
>> increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and
>> the drag was
>> considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back
>> to being worse
>> again.
>>
>> The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the
>> rear of both
>> spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
>> The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling
>> tufts of air
>> like ball bearings and they also created little low
>> pressure areas
>> behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back
>> side of the ball
>> and reduce the separation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
>> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
>> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
>> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.evalbum.com/2149

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Lee Hart

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by dale henderson-2
dale henderson wrote:
> i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt effientcy.  so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and smaller holes?

A particular pattern can be optimized for the greatest improvement at a
certain speed. If you always cruise at 70 mph, then optimize the pattern
for that speed.

If you "spread out" the pattern, you get less improvement at that
certain speed, but some improvement at other speeds.

--
Lee A. Hart | Ring the bells that still can ring
814 8th Ave N | Forget the perfect offering
Sartell MN 56377 | There is a crack in everything
leeahart earthlink.net | That's how the light gets in -- Leonard Cohen

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Roland Wiench

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by dave cover-2
You first have to remove and paint from either a metal or any other surface
which is done with a paint remover.  Then the surface is rough up with a 18
to 24 grit paper, where if you ran your fingers across this surface, it will
cut you.

If the surface is metal, you spray a coat of epoxy primer that is mix with a
epoxy primer at 200 percent.  This is very thin which looks like black ink.
This soaks deep into the metal which gives a surface that gives a good bond
to the epoxy resin that is apply to this surface.

Next the carbon fiber is lay on this wet epoxy resin and roll with a rubber
roller.  I use the type of roller that is use wall covering.  After apply
this first step, the carbon fiber surface will still have a deep waffle
pattern.  You can either leave it black or you can spray another thin epoxy
primer and leave it that way, or spray a clear and/or color coat.

This will still leave a waffle or other type of carbon fiber pattern to the
surface.  If you want to smooth this surface where the carbon fiber that
does not show any weave, than you must add more epoxy resin to the surface,
let dry until it's tacky and keep on applying more resin for two to three
more coats.

Let the surface dry for at least 24 hours and start to color sand this
surface until there is no more high and low areas on this surface.  Apply a
coat of epoxy of primer at 100 percent mix with thinner and color sand it
after it dry for 24 hours.  The shoot it with epoxy sealer, color sand,
color coats, color sand, and then your clear coat.

It took me two years, and that's with a in house body man to reshape and
refinish my EV.

Roland




----- Original Message -----
From: "dave cover" <[hidden email]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics


So how would you apply this to a surface to maintain the correct
"roughness" and yet have a durable surface? If you applied it like
regular fiberglass, wouldn't you end up smoothing it out? Don't know
but I want to. Jerry?

Dave Cover

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Roland Wiench <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Here is a material at: http:www.uscomposites.com/carbonpage.html in a
> certain weave size that is apply to race cars. NASCARs have this material
> right behind the rear window. GT Group 7 cars will have the entire top
> cover with this material which is just clear coated.
>
> Jet fighters may have the under surfaces of the rear elevators made out of
> this material which is only coated with a de-gloss resin.
>
> The size of the carbon fiber looks like in the 17 oz size.
>
> Roland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dale henderson" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>
>
> i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt
> effientcy. so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and
> smaller holes?
>
> harry
>
> Albuquerque, NM
> current bike: http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
> current non-bike: http://evalbum.com/1581
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/22/09, Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:39 PM
>> >
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began
>> by testing if a dirty
>> > car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on
>> the assumption of a
>> > dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on
>> a golf ball break up
>> > the airflow and result in better aerodynamics).
>> Well the dirty car got
>> > poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was
>> busted. BUT then they created a
>> > car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot
>> like that of a golf ball
>> > (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it
>> improved gas mileage by
>> > 11% over a smooth surface on the same car.
>> Here's a link:
>> >
>> > http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
>> >
>> > For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making
>> body panels with a
>> > dimpled surface could potentially improve range.
>> Doing it on the sheet
>> > metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult
>> to do (as they
>> > explained in the episode). They used a clay
>> material added to the outside
>> > of the car for the test.
>>
>> I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular
>> speed or narrow
>> speed range.
>> And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>>
>> In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a
>> blower box
>> with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance
>> beam where
>> you could put two shapes
>> You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the
>> airflow for
>> each air stream.
>> One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls
>> at various air
>> speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent,
>> they took
>> one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a
>> scratch awl.
>> At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As
>> speed was
>> increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and
>> the drag was
>> considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back
>> to being worse
>> again.
>>
>> The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the
>> rear of both
>> spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
>> The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling
>> tufts of air
>> like ball bearings and they also created little low
>> pressure areas
>> behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back
>> side of the ball
>> and reduce the separation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
>> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
>> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
>> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.evalbum.com/2149

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev 

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Chip Gribben

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jeff Shanab
The Corbin Sparrow, an electric three-wheeler alot of us remember,  
had dimples on the back side of the front fenders. The front part of  
the fenders remained smooth.

Check them out here:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/CorbinSparrow..jpg

Chip Gribben
NEDRA




On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:00 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dale henderson" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves  
> aerodynamics
>
>
> i assume the size of the dimples corresponds to a certain velocity wrt
> effientcy.  so what if the dimples had a fractal pattern of larger and
> smaller holes?
>
> harry
>
> Albuquerque, NM
> current bike:  http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1179
> current non-bike: http://evalbum.com/1581
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/22/09, Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> From: Jeff Shanab <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: [EVDL]  Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:39 PM
>>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> Saw an episode of Mythbusters last night - they began
>> by testing if a dirty
>>> car gets better gas mileage than a clean car (based on
>> the assumption of a
>>> dirty car giving a "golf ball effect" - the dimples on
>> a golf ball break up
>>> the airflow and result in better aerodynamics).
>> Well the dirty car got
>>> poorer gas mileage so the initial myth was
>> busted. BUT then they created a
>>> car with a truly dimpled surface that looked a lot
>> like that of a golf ball
>>> (dimples enlarged to the scale of the car) and it
>> improved gas mileage by
>>> 11% over a smooth surface on the same car.
>> Here's a link:
>>>
>>> http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-dirty-vs-clean-car/
>>>
>>> For those who are perhaps up to custom designs, making
>> body panels with a
>>> dimpled surface could potentially improve range.
>> Doing it on the sheet
>>> metal of an existing car would be extremely difficult
>> to do (as they
>>> explained in the episode). They used a clay
>> material added to the outside
>>> of the car for the test.
>>
>> I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular
>> speed or narrow
>> speed range.
>> And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>>
>> In our fluids class they showed an experiment that used a
>> blower box
>> with two round holes and suspended above this was a balance
>> beam where
>> you could put two shapes
>> You also could introduce smoke tracers at the center of the
>> airflow for
>> each air stream.
>> One of the tests had two identical lacquered wooden balls
>> at various air
>> speeds. After showing they were aerodynamically equivalent,
>> they took
>> one ball and scratched it at regular intervals with a
>> scratch awl.
>> At low speeds the scratches made horrific added drag. As
>> speed was
>> increased, there was a point where the scale shifted and
>> the drag was
>> considerably less than the smooth ball. Then it went back
>> to being worse
>> again.
>>
>> The smoke revealed what happened. The air separated at the
>> rear of both
>> spheres causing most the drag at higher speeds.
>> The scratches did 2 things. They filled with little rolling
>> tufts of air
>> like ball bearings and they also created little low
>> pressure areas
>> behind that caused the airstream to curve with the back
>> side of the ball
>> and reduce the separation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
>> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
>> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
>> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

storm connors

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by dave cover-2
Moon disks! Back to the 50s.

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:41 AM, dave cover <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I was thinking of making fiberglass "hubcaps" for my car, but very
> flat and covering most of the wheel. (Brake cooling may suffer.) The
> intention being to improve aerodynamics. If that worked, how about
> dimpling the surface like a golf ball? Does the dimple size depend on
> what speed you plan on averaging? The dimples on the Mythbusters car
> were quite large compared to a golf balls dimples. Anyone know of any
> dimple research projects?
>
> Dave Cover
>
> PS, Myers Motors used to dimple parts of their bodywork, seems to be
> missing on the NMG2.
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Bill Dube <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Actually, it works for a very wide range of speeds.
>>
>> You trip the boundary layer a bit early on purpose. At slower speeds,
>> this is"'just in time" and at higher speeds it is a bit early, but no
>> big deal. At very slow speeds, the aero drag is so small it hardly matters.
>>
>> Bill Dube'
>>
>> .
>>
>>>I would guess that improves mileage Only at a particular speed or narrow
>>>speed range.
>>>And probably worsens it at speeds +/-10mph from that.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
>> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
>> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
>> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.evalbum.com/2149
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/1059
http://stormselectric.blogspot.com/
Storm

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Bob Sisson

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Has anyone sent pictures of the Sparrow and others back to Mythbusters?

The list might get some attention if we got mentioned on their site....

Bob Sisson
1993 Geo Metro Convertible Project
Gaithersburg MD

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

nicklogan

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by storm connors
I got flat stainless steel ones for my EV (mainly because I liked the looks - they aren't going to improve the aerodynamics of a pick-up truck much!) :

http://www.jcwhitney.com/WHEEL_COVERS_RACING_DISC?ID=12;0;0;0;100001;ProductName;0;0;0;N;2003995;0;0




Moon disks! Back to the 50s.
Buddy Mills @ Cox.net

Re: Racing Disc

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Just ordered these and should be here on Tuesday

http://hubcapmike.com/rdc01-13.html


-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
Of nicklogan
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:21 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics


I got flat stainless steel ones for my EV (mainly because I liked the looks
-
they aren't going to improve the aerodynamics of a pick-up truck much!) :

http://www.jcwhitney.com/WHEEL_COVERS_RACING_DISC?ID=12;0;0;0;100001;Product
Name;0;0;0;N;2003995;0;0




Moon disks! Back to the 50s.

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Mythbusters%3A-Golf-Ball-Effect-improves-aerodynamics-
tp26020851p26145997.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

dave cover-2

Re: Racing Disc

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I wonder if they are rated for any specific top speed? If they just
snap in around the edge, would they allow them at Bonneville or a drag
strip?

Dave Cover

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Buddy Mills <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just ordered these and should be here on Tuesday
>
> http://hubcapmike.com/rdc01-13.html
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of nicklogan
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:21 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>
>
> I got flat stainless steel ones for my EV (mainly because I liked the looks
> -
> they aren't going to improve the aerodynamics of a pick-up truck much!) :
>
> http://www.jcwhitney.com/WHEEL_COVERS_RACING_DISC?ID=12;0;0;0;100001;Product
> Name;0;0;0;N;2003995;0;0
>
>
>
>
> Moon disks! Back to the 50s.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Mythbusters%3A-Golf-Ball-Effect-improves-aerodynamics-
> tp26020851p26145997.html
> Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.evalbum.com/2149

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Willie McKemie-3

Re: Racing Disc

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:23:17PM -0500, dave cover wrote:
> I wonder if they are rated for any specific top speed? If they just
> snap in around the edge, would they allow them at Bonneville or a drag
> strip?

"Screw-On" versions are offered:
http://www.hubcapmike.com/screw-on-instruct.html

BTW, the easiest way to navigate that site seems to be to use the "Site
Map".

--
Willie, ONWARD!  Through the fog!
http://counter.li.org Linux registered user #228836 since 1995
Debian3.1/GNU/Linux system uptime  688 days  1 hours 26 minutes

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

David Dymaxion

Re: Racing Disc

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by dave cover-2
Snap on disks are not allowed for Salt Flats or SCCA racing. You have to screw them on with 6 screws or 3? Dzus fasteners.




________________________________
From: dave cover <[hidden email]>
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 7:23:17 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Racing Disc

I wonder if they are rated for any specific top speed? If they just
snap in around the edge, would they allow them at Bonneville or a drag
strip?

Dave Cover

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Buddy Mills <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just ordered these and should be here on Tuesday
>
> http://hubcapmike.com/rdc01-13.html
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of nicklogan
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:21 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics
>
>
> I got flat stainless steel ones for my EV (mainly because I liked the looks
> -
> they aren't going to improve the aerodynamics of a pick-up truck much!) :
>
> http://www.jcwhitney.com/WHEEL_COVERS_RACING_DISC?ID=12;0;0;0;100001;Product
> Name;0;0;0;N;2003995;0;0
>
>
>
>
> Moon disks! Back to the 50s.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Mythbusters%3A-Golf-Ball-Effect-improves-aerodynamics-
> tp26020851p26145997.html
> Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
> _______________________________________________
> General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
> Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
> Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
> Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>



--
http://www.evalbum.com/2149

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev


     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20091102/c34faaa7/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Nick Drouin

Re: Mythbusters: Golf Ball Effect improves aerodynamics

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by nicklogan
Nothing against Mythbusters, but here's another take on it, almost five
months ago:
http://watch.ctv.ca/daily-planet/season-14/daily-planet-june-09-2009/#clip181550
  [video unfortunately cuts out after 5:11 mins...]

In particular, the product they were looking at is:
http://www.fastskinz.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20091103/a36d732b/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Elithion

Re: Elithion communication with PFC-20 and Zilla

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
> Willie McKemie wrote:

>  Add to that the difficulty of extracting information from or
about Elithion ...

I am really sorry about that, Willie. We are very prompt at responding to
emails; but you never wrote us, so, no, we never had a chance to respond.
Today you pointed out that you did indeed ask questions about the Elithion
system, some time back, but you did so here, in the EVDL. If you feel that
we should be on top of that, and answer all questions that may appear on
line somewhere, then you are right, and I apologize.

Nonetheless, I must clarify that we offer free tech support only to
Elithion clients, and, as you yourself said, you are not an Elithion
client. Elithion clients pay full price, and they deserve our full
attention. For non-clients, we do offer tech support on a consulting
basis. Though you should really be asking your vendor for tech support; if
needed, we'll help your vendor answer your question.

In any case, our website is full of information, and answers to all your
questions were already there, as Travis so kindly pointed out.

>   So, I now have my third EVPower BMS in the pipeline...

The EV Power BMS is a very nice product, and I am happy that it fills your
needs. I am sorry that the Elithion Lithiumate was not a good match for
your application. Please let us help you find a new home for it.

Thank you,
D'de
Davide Andrea

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Davide Andrea
Elithion
1 2