On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Stephen and Sherry Kinser schrieb:
>> What's the activity on resolving CONFIGURATION-390? I see it's
>> slated to be
>> fixed in 1.7, but how likely is that to happen? This threading
>> issue is
>> killing me. I'd rather not have to synchronize every every
>> configuration
>> call just because I need to be able to reload the configuration
>> when the
>> file changes. Is the plan to still support the thread-safety claim
>> that Oliver
>> Heger made back in 2006 (
>>
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-user@.../msg14490.html
>> )?
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen Kinser
>
> I cannot promise when I come to it, but I am going to have a look at
> this issue. The goal is still that read-only access to a
> configuration should be thread-safe.
>
I am running into this into production. I will have to attack this
over the weekend. I'm sure it won't be pretty. At least on the 2.0
branch we can start using read/write locks. In 1.7 it will have to use
synchronize(), probably in many places.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[hidden email]
