Re: GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did they)

6 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Bill Dube

KillaCycle in the NY Daily News

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Chip Gribben

Re: GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did they)

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hi Charles,

Shortly before the 2005 NEDRA Power of DC I actually did speak to a  
GM Engineer, Raj Choudhury, about the BYU EV1.  Raj is one of the  
lead engineers for the GM Fuel Cell Program.

At the time, he was considering bringing a GM fuel cell car to  
compete at the event but pulled out at the last minute because they  
weren't able to support the car with a crew that weekend. I was  
really hoping we could race the BYU car against the fuel cell car.

Anyway, we got to talking about the BYU EV1 and Raj thought it was  
great project and he mentioned the whole purpose of letting the  
universities have the EV1 was for the reason that BYU was using the  
car. And that is, reconfiguring it and experimenting with different  
drive systems and racing it. GM is apparently impressed with what the  
BYU crew has done with it and the car was on display at Dearborn for  
awhile. At the race, Tom Erekson, the professor at BYU, did mention  
that under the agreement they had with GM the car couldn't be driven  
on public roads but racing it on a track was fine and encouraged.

Chip Gribben

On Dec 22, 2007, at 7:53 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:48:00 -0800
> From: Robert MacDowell <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did
> they)
> To: Charles Whalen <[hidden email]>, Electric Vehicle
> Discussion List <[hidden email]>
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Liability.  They're an automaker, and I'll bet that changes their
> product liability picture *dramatically* as compared to you and I.
>
> What's more this is a completely NEW car with totally new technologies
> no one had built before.  They weren't just slapping Optimas and a  
> Zilla
> into a Camaro.  Most of the features on this car, nobody knew how this
> stuff would age.  Would the frame deteriorate over time and shatter  
> on a
> pothole on the 101?  Would corrosion in the controller cause traction
> current to be exposed to the driver?  What if a future owner took  
> one to
> road-salt country?  Nobody knew.   This car is a wild weasel of
> liability risk.
>
> So cut GM some slack on this one.  What a horrid day for EVs if one  
> was
> publicly involved in a freak accident!
>
> Now the EV1 race car is a different thing.  People expect race cars to
> explode in a ball of flames.  Nobody sues Ford when a Mustang dragster
> blows up because the racer is expected to modify every aspect of the
> vehicle for racing.  Plus I believe this donation was prior to the
> others (Sept. 2002)?
>
>
> Robert

_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Bob Rice-2

Re: KillaCycle in the NY Daily News

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Bill Dube
   Hi EVerybody;

    Good article! Short and to the point. Congrats Bill, ya made it to the
Least Coast!Had I known I woulda BOUGHT several copies!

   Seeya

   Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Dube" <[hidden email]>
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 6:44 AM
Subject: [EVDL] KillaCycle in the NY Daily News


> http://www.nydailynews.com/services/autos/2007/12/18/2007-12-18_the_fastest_electric_killacycle.html
>
> Bill D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1023 - Release Date:
> 9/22/2007 1:27 PM
>
>

_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
gottdi

Re: KillaCycle in the NY Daily News

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Bill Dube
the whole crowd went 'Whoahhh.'


I can hear that now just thinking about it. I have seen the videos of  
this bike and Whoahhhh is the word of the day when you see it in  
action. That was exactly my reaction. Just imagine being there at pit  
level. Boy I'd love to see it and be right there. Some day maybe.


Pete
  :  )




On Dec 22, 2007, at 3:44 AM, Bill Dube wrote:

> http://www.nydailynews.com/services/autos/ 
> 2007/12/18/2007-12-18_the_fastest_electric_killacycle.html
>
> Bill D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> For subscription options, see
> http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Charles Whalen

Re: GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did they)

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Chip Gribben
Hi Chip,

I was thinking that you in particular might have some insight and personal
connection to the BYU team from that 2005 PoDC appearance they made with
their ultracap-powered EV1, so I was hoping you might chime in on this.
Very interesting!  ... Especially GM's inconsistent treatment between BYU on
the one hand (which is allowed to run their EV1 on private roads, including
dragstrips) and WWU on the other hand (which is not allowed to run their EV1
on private roads).  I suppose the two agreements might have slightly
different wording.  Thanks for sharing that!

Charles Whalen


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chip Gribben" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did they)

Hi Charles,

Shortly before the 2005 NEDRA Power of DC I actually did speak to a
GM Engineer, Raj Choudhury, about the BYU EV1.  Raj is one of the
lead engineers for the GM Fuel Cell Program.

At the time, he was considering bringing a GM fuel cell car to
compete at the event but pulled out at the last minute because they
weren't able to support the car with a crew that weekend. I was
really hoping we could race the BYU car against the fuel cell car.

Anyway, we got to talking about the BYU EV1 and Raj thought it was
great project and he mentioned the whole purpose of letting the
universities have the EV1 was for the reason that BYU was using the
car. And that is, reconfiguring it and experimenting with different
drive systems and racing it. GM is apparently impressed with what the
BYU crew has done with it and the car was on display at Dearborn for
awhile. At the race, Tom Erekson, the professor at BYU, did mention
that under the agreement they had with GM the car couldn't be driven
on public roads but racing it on a track was fine and encouraged.

Chip Gribben

_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev
Chip Gribben

Re: GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did they)

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Chip Gribben
Hi Charles,

I actually met them at the 2003 NEDRA Wicked Watts race in Las Vegas  
and Tom had mentioned wanting to come out to the Power of DC. It took  
them about a year through various trials to get the right axle  
combination set up since the car had so much torque off the line.  
They had custom machine hardened axles made up.

In the case of the BYU EV1 running Ultracaps, the car only goes about  
1/4 to 1/2 mile before it needs recharging. I'm not exactly sure what  
the range is though. Then they dump charge the caps with a set of  
Optima Red Tops from their support truck.

The crew pushes the car from the pits to the starting line to save as  
much juice as possible.

And I believe the steering is not set up for street use as well. The  
car takes a wide radius to turn. They also have drag slicks on the  
front.

So in this case, driving on a public or private road isn't really  
relevant for this particular EV1. It's a completely different animal  
then the WWU EV1. The BYU EV1 isn't a street car so there is no  
temptation to drive it as one. It's closer to a dragster then  
anything else. So I don't believe there is any difference in the  
requirements between the Universities. It's more of a difference in  
the vehicles.

I'm not really sure I would consider a 1/4 mile drag strip a private  
road though. It's a track whose purpose is set up for competitive  
racing much like an oval track or speedway track. It's private but  
it's not really a "road" per se.

But I would like to know where the line for competition really is  
drawn. Would GM allow the WWU EV1 or any other University EV1 to be  
entered in a competition like the Tour de Sol, the 21st Century Race  
or the EV Challenge where part of the competition (the range event)  
is held on public roads. Would GM allow that? I imagine the car must  
have legal tags and title to be driven on public roads so the EV1 may  
be excluded from public road competitions.

Chip Gribben



On Dec 22, 2007, at 9:33 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Message: 15
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:22:59 -0500
> From: "Charles Whalen" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did
> they)
> To: "EV Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Message-ID: <015501c844e0$d5501ee0$0600a8c0@InesDesk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Chip,
>
> I was thinking that you in particular might have some insight and  
> personal
> connection to the BYU team from that 2005 PoDC appearance they made  
> with
> their ultracap-powered EV1, so I was hoping you might chime in on  
> this.
> Very interesting!  ... Especially GM's inconsistent treatment  
> between BYU on
> the one hand (which is allowed to run their EV1 on private roads,  
> including
> dragstrips) and WWU on the other hand (which is not allowed to run  
> their EV1
> on private roads).  I suppose the two agreements might have slightly
> different wording.  Thanks for sharing that!
>
> Charles Whalen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chip Gribben" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM reacts to the WWU EV1 Resurrection. (or did  
> they)
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> Shortly before the 2005 NEDRA Power of DC I actually did speak to a
> GM Engineer, Raj Choudhury, about the BYU EV1.  Raj is one of the
> lead engineers for the GM Fuel Cell Program.
>
> At the time, he was considering bringing a GM fuel cell car to
> compete at the event but pulled out at the last minute because they
> weren't able to support the car with a crew that weekend. I was
> really hoping we could race the BYU car against the fuel cell car.
>
> Anyway, we got to talking about the BYU EV1 and Raj thought it was
> great project and he mentioned the whole purpose of letting the
> universities have the EV1 was for the reason that BYU was using the
> car. And that is, reconfiguring it and experimenting with different
> drive systems and racing it. GM is apparently impressed with what the
> BYU crew has done with it and the car was on display at Dearborn for
> awhile. At the race, Tom Erekson, the professor at BYU, did mention
> that under the agreement they had with GM the car couldn't be driven
> on public roads but racing it on a track was fine and encouraged.
>
> Chip Gribben

_______________________________________________
For subscription options, see
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev