Sample partial hi-res pan using GF1

[bohonus]

Here's a partial pan (9,630 x 29,503) shot using the GF1 with its 14-45mm kit lens set at 45mm (90mm 35 equiv).

http://tinyurl.com/y8rp2lx

Three rows of 16 (RAW->ACR->TIFF). Stitched and optimized in Autopano Pro. Shot from a 360P Adjuste.

I have a the 45-200 MFT lens and Gigapan Epic100 coming later today. We'll see how much sharpness I'll lose, and how much C/A & Fringing I'll gain by bumping it to 200mm (400mm 35 equiv).

[John Riley-2]

Thanks for the sample.  I have been seriously considering getting a  
GF1.  What ISO were you using?  The sky looks a little noisy for such  
a beautiful day.  That is a lot of blue sky for Seattle!


John

John Riley
[hidden email]
(h)864-461-3504
(c)864-431-7075
(w)864-503-5775

On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:09 AM, bohonus wrote:

> Here's a partial pan (9,630 x 29,503) shot using the GF1 with its  
> 14-45mm kit lens set at 45mm (90mm 35 equiv).
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y8rp2lx
>
> Three rows of 16 (RAW->ACR->TIFF). Stitched and optimized in  
> Autopano Pro. Shot from a 360P Adjuste.
>
> I have a the 45-200 MFT lens and Gigapan Epic100 coming later today.  
> We'll see how much sharpness I'll lose, and how much C/A & Fringing  
> I'll gain by bumping it to 200mm (400mm 35 equiv).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[bohonus]

--- In [hidden email], John Riley <johnriley@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the sample.  I have been seriously considering getting a  
> GF1.  What ISO were you using?  The sky looks a little noisy for such  
> a beautiful day.  

ISO 100, f/11, 1/320s

I didn't do any additional NR beyond ACR defaults. I did sharpen the edges of the final pano a little using a layer edge mask in LAB afterwards and I think ACR applied a small bit of sharpening over all.

>That is a lot of blue sky for Seattle!

Yes, especially this time of the year. It makes it difficult sometimes to get shots like this because it can get completely overcast again in as little as an hour sometimes.