Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

14 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Sivakatirswami

Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I'm interesting in deploying some apps that use Devanagiri and Tamil
Unicode text, and making them appear correctly on both Windows and
Apples machines.

I'm just beginning the foray into the unicode world in InDesign after
waiting for several years for InDesign to get up to speed. Today it has,
well, almost. By using IndicPlus plug in, (fabulous and only $20.00) we
can now display OT (Open Type) unicode Indic fonts in InDesign.

But of course, I want to use RunRev Stacks -- it's more fun for users...
(smile)

The issue will be: Apple's use of the Atsui rendering engine which will
only properly display AAT unicode fonts (Apple Advance Typographical)
fonts. Meanwhile on Windows uses its own rendering engine and unicode
fonts must have OT Tables. At the Mac developer conference recently, one
top IT man from Malaysia who was there said that Apple will probably not
move form it's position in sticking with AAT fonts, and for good reason.
Apparently Window messed up with OneScribe engine and now users are
having trouble (it works one way on XP, another on Vista and some valid
OT fonts are not rendering properly at all on Vista). Meanwhile Adobe
has clearly made decision to write code for windows first and mac
second, and for some reason obstinately continues to lag behind in the
rendering of AAT fonts, even when Windows is starting to... end of sob
story... some of you must know it well already.

My assumption is: and please correct me if I am wrong: Revolution will
use the Atsui engine on the Mac to render Unicode fonts and therefore,
only AAT fonts will display properly. Meanwhile, that same stack, if it
were put on a  Windows machine, will only work by calling a different OT
unicode font. Second assumption is that the work around for dealing with
this incompatibility issue would be to check for the platform and then
call a different font for the fields being use to display text. This
assumes that the unicode will be the same regardless of the font or
rendering environment.

but then, we have the old problem: will the user have the necessary
fonts on his system? Ideally we could carry the fonts in the stacks
themselves, but my understanding is that Rev embedded font capability is
limited to True Type fonts and not AAT fonts or OT fonts. So it will
mean either storing a font in a custom prop and then offering it to the
user to install (one for Mac and one for Win)  or send them URL's with
instructions to download and install those fonts.

I'm hoping I'm wrong about this and that before I go down that road,
someone will tell us what brilliant solution they have for dealing with
this in Revolution. For Japanese, Chinese someone must have faced all
these issues already.

Danyavad - Thank you
Sivakatirswami

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Hmm, I had a similar problem about 4 years ago when I had to dish out
a lot of Cyrillic text. HOWEVER, as the text was STATIC (i.e. none of the
end users were expected to interact with it) after an awful lot of
headache-causing experiments I just typed out the texts and then
embedded them into the stacks as IMAGES.

By-the-by, isn't the first writing system 'Devanagari' rather than
'Devenagiri'?
something to do with snakes, methinks.  :)

Also, having dug out my McDonell Sanskrit dictionary and attempting to check
the meaning of a few words from the Rg-Veda (in my Vedic Reader) I fell foul
of the fact that Vedic (as opposed to classical Sanskrit) uses a larger
Devanagari alphabet than Sanskrit (about 4 more letters) - those extra
letters
are not, as far as I know - included in Unicode (which, I think, bases its
Devanagari on Hindi).

So, hmm, faut de meux, if you are going to quote shruti or smriti I would
be inclined to stick to pictorial representations of text.

Now, there are some reasonably respectable TTF unicode fonts "out there"
that contain Nagari letters, so I don't think it is necessary to "get
all worked up"
about other 'funny' types of fonts.

Umm, sorry, got to rush off and see my accountant (monthly ritual) and
then teach Modal Verbs (Aargh), however, this evening will try and give
this a spot more thought and get back to you.

Shanti.

Sivakatirswami wrote:

> I'm interesting in deploying some apps that use Devanagiri and Tamil
> Unicode text, and making them appear correctly on both Windows and
> Apples machines.
>
> I'm just beginning the foray into the unicode world in InDesign after
> waiting for several years for InDesign to get up to speed. Today it
> has, well, almost. By using IndicPlus plug in, (fabulous and only
> $20.00) we can now display OT (Open Type) unicode Indic fonts in
> InDesign.
>
> But of course, I want to use RunRev Stacks -- it's more fun for
> users... (smile)
>
> The issue will be: Apple's use of the Atsui rendering engine which
> will only properly display AAT unicode fonts (Apple Advance
> Typographical) fonts. Meanwhile on Windows uses its own rendering
> engine and unicode fonts must have OT Tables. At the Mac developer
> conference recently, one top IT man from Malaysia who was there said
> that Apple will probably not move form it's position in sticking with
> AAT fonts, and for good reason. Apparently Window messed up with
> OneScribe engine and now users are having trouble (it works one way on
> XP, another on Vista and some valid OT fonts are not rendering
> properly at all on Vista). Meanwhile Adobe has clearly made decision
> to write code for windows first and mac second, and for some reason
> obstinately continues to lag behind in the rendering of AAT fonts,
> even when Windows is starting to... end of sob story... some of you
> must know it well already.
>
> My assumption is: and please correct me if I am wrong: Revolution will
> use the Atsui engine on the Mac to render Unicode fonts and therefore,
> only AAT fonts will display properly. Meanwhile, that same stack, if
> it were put on a  Windows machine, will only work by calling a
> different OT unicode font. Second assumption is that the work around
> for dealing with this incompatibility issue would be to check for the
> platform and then call a different font for the fields being use to
> display text. This assumes that the unicode will be the same
> regardless of the font or rendering environment.
>
> but then, we have the old problem: will the user have the necessary
> fonts on his system? Ideally we could carry the fonts in the stacks
> themselves, but my understanding is that Rev embedded font capability
> is limited to True Type fonts and not AAT fonts or OT fonts. So it
> will mean either storing a font in a custom prop and then offering it
> to the user to install (one for Mac and one for Win)  or send them
> URL's with instructions to download and install those fonts.
>
> I'm hoping I'm wrong about this and that before I go down that road,
> someone will tell us what brilliant solution they have for dealing
> with this in Revolution. For Japanese, Chinese someone must have faced
> all these issues already.
>
> Danyavad - Thank you
> Sivakatirswami
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Sivakatirswami
Err, Um, Gosh . . . Sankrit fonts seem to be extremely complex:

this seems about the best place to find a COMPLETE Sanskrit Devanagari font:

http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/t/ttf-indic-fonts/

(By COMPLETE I don't mean just a font that has the simple syllabics,
but allows all the conjunct consonants)

However a large number of the characters have no Unicode numbers . . .

&

"The Unicode Standard provides codes for Devanagari characters in the
range of 0900-097F,
which are used for representing classical Sanskrit, Hindi and Marathi.
However, it does not
contain the additional characters needed for representing Vedic Sanskrit
texts. Many of these
characters combine with Devanagari characters and therefore constitute a
part of the
Devanagari script. To get these additional Vedic characters included in
the Unicode
standard, it is necessary to submit a formal proposal to the Unicode
Consortium."

can't remember where that came from - was lying around on one of my Hard
drives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As these fonts are Open Source I am going to remap one of them
using an Open Source font editor (Fontforge) into a "normal" ttf
font: will then release it under the GNU thingummy-bob and any
RunRevver who feels the urge can use it and embed it in their stacks
and or standalones as they feel fit.

Of course the Key-mapping will also be a "pain-in-the-karma-chameleon"
so will try to run up a reasonable key mapping for Macintosh, and
provide some "sexy pictures" so that people actually stand a chance of
being able to type with the font.

Once a font has been remapped as a non-Unicode font and is embedded
in a RR stack it should show up properly whether rendered on Mac, Win,
Lin or . . .chuckle, chuckle . . . the new system that is looming from
Google.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Sivakatirswami
I was wrong about the ubuntu Devanagari fonts I mentioned earlier:

http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/t/ttf-indic-fonts/

they do have unicode numbers above hex 10000; however, that in and of
itself should not be a problem.

I intend to gutter around with them in RR and see how they 'do' on
Mac, Win XP (Yup: VPC) and Linux . . .


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Sivakatirswami

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Richmond Mathewson-2
Richmond:

My crazy "dream" would be to have a revApplet that runs in a browser
and/or a desktop client that accesses Tamil-Devanagari (you're right I
had the spelling wrong) data from the web server in flat files, or
possibly in a dBase... loads the text, edit and sends it back to the
server, then can be imported into Indesign, emails etc.  works on all
platforms...

I have also done the indic-text-as-images on web pages, but there are
enough mandates for edits, portability, interactivity that no longer
works, and the mandate now for all kinds of reasons: moving forward, the
data must be in unicode.

If you *do* manage to build a OT-TTF-Unicode font for Devanagari that
works in Rev on both Windows and Mac I would be very, very interested.
I'm sure it would probably work in Windows too.

As for keyboards: if you can, stick with standards: on the Mac, there's
the Devanagari QWERTY and also the Devanagari (which follows a pattern
based on the Devanagari alphabet)  I can send those to you if you need
them. Only thing (argh!) both fail to offer key input for udatta and
anudatta (stress marks, 0951, 0952) and the only environment that you
can use to pick them is from the Glyphs palette in InDesign. If you are
inputting into Pages or MSword, there is no input method for those to
chars, which are mission critical...


 from Richmond Mathewson wrote:

> Hmm, I had a similar problem about 4 years ago when I had to dish out
> a lot of Cyrillic text. HOWEVER, as the text was STATIC (i.e. none of the
> end users were expected to interact with it) after an awful lot of
> headache-causing experiments I just typed out the texts and then
> embedded them into the stacks as IMAGES.
>
> By-the-by, isn't the first writing system 'Devanagari' rather than
> 'Devenagiri'?
> something to do with snakes, methinks.  :)
>
> Also, having dug out my McDonell Sanskrit dictionary and attempting to
> check
> the meaning of a few words from the Rg-Veda (in my Vedic Reader) I
> fell foul
> of the fact that Vedic (as opposed to classical Sanskrit) uses a larger
> Devanagari alphabet than Sanskrit (about 4 more letters) - those extra
> letters
> are not, as far as I know - included in Unicode (which, I think, bases
> its
> Devanagari on Hindi).
>
> So, hmm, faut de meux, if you are going to quote shruti or smriti I would
> be inclined to stick to pictorial representations of text.
>
> Now, there are some reasonably respectable TTF unicode fonts "out there"
> that contain Nagari letters, so I don't think it is necessary to "get
> all worked up"
> about other 'funny' types of fonts.
>
> Umm, sorry, got to rush off and see my accountant (monthly ritual) and
> then teach Modal Verbs (Aargh), however, this evening will try and give
> this a spot more thought and get back to you.
>
> Shanti.
>
> Sivakatirswami wrote:
>> I'm interesting in deploying some apps that use Devanagiri and Tamil
>> Unicode text, and making them appear correctly on both Windows and
>> Apples machines.
>>
>> I'm just beginning the foray into the unicode world in InDesign after
>> waiting for several years for InDesign to get up to speed. Today it
>> has, well, almost. By using IndicPlus plug in, (fabulous and only
>> $20.00) we can now display OT (Open Type) unicode Indic fonts in
>> InDesign.
>>
>> But of course, I want to use RunRev Stacks -- it's more fun for
>> users... (smile)
>>
>> The issue will be: Apple's use of the Atsui rendering engine which
>> will only properly display AAT unicode fonts (Apple Advance
>> Typographical) fonts. Meanwhile on Windows uses its own rendering
>> engine and unicode fonts must have OT Tables. At the Mac developer
>> conference recently, one top IT man from Malaysia who was there said
>> that Apple will probably not move form it's position in sticking with
>> AAT fonts, and for good reason. Apparently Window messed up with
>> OneScribe engine and now users are having trouble (it works one way
>> on XP, another on Vista and some valid OT fonts are not rendering
>> properly at all on Vista). Meanwhile Adobe has clearly made decision
>> to write code for windows first and mac second, and for some reason
>> obstinately continues to lag behind in the rendering of AAT fonts,
>> even when Windows is starting to... end of sob story... some of you
>> must know it well already.
>>
>> My assumption is: and please correct me if I am wrong: Revolution
>> will use the Atsui engine on the Mac to render Unicode fonts and
>> therefore, only AAT fonts will display properly. Meanwhile, that same
>> stack, if it were put on a  Windows machine, will only work by
>> calling a different OT unicode font. Second assumption is that the
>> work around for dealing with this incompatibility issue would be to
>> check for the platform and then call a different font for the fields
>> being use to display text. This assumes that the unicode will be the
>> same regardless of the font or rendering environment.
>>
>> but then, we have the old problem: will the user have the necessary
>> fonts on his system? Ideally we could carry the fonts in the stacks
>> themselves, but my understanding is that Rev embedded font capability
>> is limited to True Type fonts and not AAT fonts or OT fonts. So it
>> will mean either storing a font in a custom prop and then offering it
>> to the user to install (one for Mac and one for Win)  or send them
>> URL's with instructions to download and install those fonts.
>>
>> I'm hoping I'm wrong about this and that before I go down that road,
>> someone will tell us what brilliant solution they have for dealing
>> with this in Revolution. For Japanese, Chinese someone must have
>> faced all these issues already.
>>
>> Danyavad - Thank you
>> Sivakatirswami
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I think that any unicode font is going to throw up more problems than it
is going to solve,
here's why:

http://mathewson.110mb.com/skt.html  (page not accessible from my homepage)

Now, unless somebody can come up with a way of using numToChar with
Hexadecimal encoding refs rather
than unicode addresses we are going to be stuck with regard to conjunct
consonants (and, let's face it, we
all have a secret urge to write 'GNR' or 'GR' in Devanagari from time to
time).

So . . . I hope, over this weekend to get to grips with taking a free
Devanagari font "to bits" and popping
it back together as an extended non-unicode ttf font.

Sivakatirswami wrote:
> Richmond:
>
> My crazy "dream" would be to have a revApplet that runs in a browser
> and/or a desktop client that accesses Tamil-Devanagari (you're right I
> had the spelling wrong) data from the web server in flat files, or
> possibly in a dBase... loads the text, edit and sends it back to the
> server, then can be imported into Indesign, emails etc.  works on all
> platforms...
>
Um, what is Tamil-Devanagari? Although it is obvious that the Tamil
writing system has developed from Devanagari, I don't
understand what 'Tamil-Devanagari' is; unless you are intending to write
Tamil in Devanagari.
> I have also done the indic-text-as-images on web pages, but there are
> enough mandates for edits, portability, interactivity that no longer
> works, and the mandate now for all kinds of reasons: moving forward,
> the data must be in unicode.
NO; it doesn't have to be in Unicode as long as you stick with one
'in-house' font (which 'old-sweaty-socks' here is trying to provide)
which is embedded in everything, and in the case of your DTP packages,
available on whatever systems they are running on.

>
> If you *do* manage to build a OT-TTF-Unicode font for Devanagari that
> works in Rev on both Windows and Mac I would be very, very interested.
> I'm sure it would probably work in Windows too.
>
> As for keyboards: if you can, stick with standards: on the Mac,
> there's the Devanagari QWERTY and also the Devanagari (which follows a
> pattern based on the Devanagari alphabet)  I can send those to you if
> you need them. Only thing (argh!) both fail to offer key input for
> udatta and anudatta (stress marks, 0951, 0952) and the only
> environment that you can use to pick them is from the Glyphs palette
> in InDesign.
Sounds jolly tedious.
> If you are inputting into Pages or MSword, there is no input method
> for those to chars, which are mission critical...
>
>
Surely, what is needed is a TTf font with a proper keylayout that allows
all those things such as Anusvara that I have
forgotten. {I taught myself a working knowledge of Sanskrit and
translated part of Srimad Bhagavad-Gita about 25 years
ago as  got a bit fussed by the fact that so many English translations
of the text seemed to contradict each other; still
have the translated bits, mouldering in a bookshelf} . . . I really am a
nutty fruitcake.  :)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Sivakatirswami
Did you think I had forgotten?

Several nights in 40 degrees C, tossing and turning, later . . .

Bloody silly really (but then, in my case it usually is; either trying
to be too clever for my own good,
or not seeing something right under my nose):

Take a look at this:

http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/private_use_area.html

a private use area in the Basic Multilingual Plane, i.e. at unicode
numbers less than 65535.

So, cracked open my Devanagari font (provisionally called 'Mahesvara')
and shifted all the
conjunct consonants from "beyond the pale" to this area:

running between 57344 (hex E000) and 63742  (hex  F8FE).

Standard (i.e. basic) letter forms are lodged "where they should be"
between:

2309 (hex 0905) and 2416 (hex 0970)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now; a further 'sweaty night' awaits me (it, Sivakatirswami, may well be
the Brahma-Mahurta
in Hawaii, but over here it is some horrible time of the night at a
horrible time of the year) as
I try to "cook up" a Sanskrit typewriter type implementation method in
Revolution.

Don't hold your breath as it may take longer than the RR 4.0 Beta  :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anybody who feels the urge to have their own, private "night of passion"
/ "dark night
of the soul" wrestling with homemade unicode fonts is more than welcome
to help
themselves to my font at:

http://box17.110mb.com/FILEZ/MH.zip

if anybody can come up with a way of using it before I can that would be
really super.   :)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Sivakatirswami

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Aloha, Richmond:

It's getting pretty muggy here on Kauai to... classic Kauai weather, a
short rain 2-3 times a day with Average 80 Degree temps, but mid-day is
climbing to 100 in the open fields, mosquitoes are loving it. Average
density -- 12 little kamakazi's per cubic foot of atmosphere. August
will be cooking...

I see your machinations: I'm not sure I want to "go there" with the old
special conjuncts. I think it is possible to get every letter in the
devanagiri alphabet from the standard 0900–097F, if are willing to stick
to late forms. Or, (I hope not!) are there actual important conjuncts
that are in fact not available in 0900–097F ?

I was forced to order a plug in for Indesign to find a way to enter the
udatta and anudatta stress marks, which are, strangely, not available on
the current standard Devangari keyboards and thus impossible to enter in
any environment except inDesign.

These two marks are "mission critical" but Metadesignsolutions IndicPlus
plug in saved the day and least inside Indesign. But as mentioned, not
available in any other environment. That's a show stopper... Someone
else on our team threw in the towel and went back to a T1 font for his
work...well-designed, all chars available with a sensible, complete
keyboard.

I was not able to pursue this further since our last discussion and my
next publishing project that might be repurposed to a Rev environment,
will focus on Tamil...

I'm not fluent in building a keyboard... I see some old keyboards in
/Library/Keyboard Layouts/ but not everything one has access to in the
international Input Menu appears there... and I don't see them in the
sys library either... the ones I do see look simple enough XML...

Good, luck and keep me posted. And I thought Unicode was going to make
life easier (smile)





Richmond Mathewson wrote:

> Did you think I had forgotten?
>
> Several nights in 40 degrees C, tossing and turning, later . . .
>
> Bloody silly really (but then, in my case it usually is; either trying
> to be too clever for my own good,
> or not seeing something right under my nose):
>
> Take a look at this:
>
> http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/private_use_area.html
>
> a private use area in the Basic Multilingual Plane, i.e. at unicode
> numbers less than 65535.
>
> So, cracked open my Devanagari font (provisionally called 'Mahesvara')
> and shifted all the
> conjunct consonants from "beyond the pale" to this area:
>
> running between 57344 (hex E000) and 63742 (hex F8FE).
>
> Standard (i.e. basic) letter forms are lodged "where they should be"
> between:
>
> 2309 (hex 0905) and 2416 (hex 0970)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Now; a further 'sweaty night' awaits me (it, Sivakatirswami, may well
> be the Brahma-Mahurta
> in Hawaii, but over here it is some horrible time of the night at a
> horrible time of the year) as
> I try to "cook up" a Sanskrit typewriter type implementation method in
> Revolution.
>
> Don't hold your breath as it may take longer than the RR 4.0 Beta :)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Anybody who feels the urge to have their own, private "night of
> passion" / "dark night
> of the soul" wrestling with homemade unicode fonts is more than
> welcome to help
> themselves to my font at:
>
> http://box17.110mb.com/FILEZ/MH.zip
>
> if anybody can come up with a way of using it before I can that would
> be really super. :)
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Sivakatirswami wrote:
>
> I was forced to order a plug in for Indesign to find a way to enter
> the udatta and anudatta stress marks, which are, strangely, not
> available on the current standard Devangari keyboards
I suppose it would be sensible to be able to get at svarita as well  :)

Can you tell me if you would prefer me to hack 'Devanagari' or
'Devanagari - QWERTY' (the 2 keyboard layouts on my Mac)?
>
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Sivakatirswami
Hey-Ho!

At:  http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/DevKeys.zip

there are now the 2 standard Macintosh Devanagari keyboard layouts
that I have hacked to allow udatta and anudatta input.

'Devanagari'

Udatta:  Shift - B
Anudatta: Shift - N

'Devanagari-QWERTY'

Udatta:  Alt - Z
Anudatta: Alt - X

You will have to remove the original Mac keyboard layouts and replace
them with these.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This, in no way, should be interpreted as a sign of my having given up
on finding an
efficient and easy way to type PROPER Classical Sanskrit (i.e. with the
full panoply of
conjunct consonants) either in the form of a Mac keyboard layout, or,
preferably, a
Revolution based app that can offer this possibility cross-platform.

Love, Richmond

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Sorry,  the modified Mac keyboard layouts at:

At:  http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/DevKeys.zip

ONLY allow access to the Udatta and Anudatta symbols used
in the Rg and Atharva Vedas. You can mark Svarita by combining
Udatta and Anudatta.

This is because the unicode standard does not seem to either
take into account or have symbols for the way Udatta, Anudatta
and Svarita are represented in texts such as the Maitrayani Samhita ,
the Yajur Veda or the Kathaka Samhita.

Bit of a nuisance, really.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Sivakatirswami

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> Sorry,  the modified Mac keyboard layouts at:
>
> At:  http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/DevKeys.zip
>

Congrats! and Thank you!

> ONLY allow access to the Udatta and Anudatta symbols used
> in the Rg and Atharva Vedas. You can mark Svarita by combining
> Udatta and Anudatta.
>
> This is because the unicode standard does not seem to either
> take into account or have symbols for the way Udatta, Anudatta
> and Svarita are represented in texts such as the Maitrayani Samhita ,
> the Yajur Veda or the Kathaka Samhita.
>
> Bit of a nuisance, really.


Indeed, but will suffice for our simple work.

But, for the life if me, I can't find the original Devanagari and
Devanagari QWERTY keyboards to delete them...
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond Mathewson-2

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Sivakatirswami wrote:

> Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>> Sorry,  the modified Mac keyboard layouts at:
>>
>> At:  http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/DevKeys.zip
>>
>
> Congrats! and Thank you!
>> ONLY allow access to the Udatta and Anudatta symbols used
>> in the Rg and Atharva Vedas. You can mark Svarita by combining
>> Udatta and Anudatta.
>>
>> This is because the unicode standard does not seem to either
>> take into account or have symbols for the way Udatta, Anudatta
>> and Svarita are represented in texts such as the Maitrayani Samhita ,
>> the Yajur Veda or the Kathaka Samhita.
>>
>> Bit of a nuisance, really.
>
>
> Indeed, but will suffice for our simple work.
>
> But, for the life if me, I can't find the original Devanagari and
> Devanagari QWERTY keyboards to delete them...
Probably the best thing to do is to remove the original Devanagari and
Devanagari QWERTY keyboards via
System Preferences/International/Input  Control Panel; then bung my
hacks is the /Library/Keyboard Layouts.

Then log out and log in again, and the hacked keyboard layouts should
show up in System Preferences/International/Input.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Sivakatirswami

Re: Unicode - AAT vs OT fonts in Revolution

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> Sivakatirswami wrote:
>>
>>
>> But, for the life if me, I can't find the original Devanagari and
>> Devanagari QWERTY keyboards to delete them...
> Probably the best thing to do is to remove the original Devanagari and
> Devanagari QWERTY keyboards via System
> Preferences/International/Input  Control Panel;

Yes, of course, but I'm have the curiosity of a geek and  "system
secrets" keep me awake at night (kidding) --  would still like to know
exactly where Apple is hiding those things.
> then bung my hacks is the /Library/Keyboard Layouts.

Yes that will work...

>
> Then log out and log in again, and the hacked keyboard layouts should
> show up in System Preferences/International/Input.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[hidden email]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution