Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

6 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Jeff Shanab

Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
<snip>

> Re 70 mph crashes: even 35 mph frontal crash tests put occupants near
> the limits of survivability in both large and small cars.  In side
> impacts (at 31 mph), G forces at the hip can be 100 or more.  Although a
> Smart Car (and many other cars) can appear (in web videos) to survive a
> 70 mph barrier crash with the safety cage still more or less intact, no
> occupant can survive such a crash, and none of the car's systems are
> designed for such impacts.  (Truth be told, cars are designed to the
> crash tests, just as they are designed to the EPA tests.  There are some
> small exceptions, with Volvo, for example, having gone beyond the
> requirements, especially in the early days, but in cases where the
> standards are lax, as in rollover protection, the manufacturers are lax
> too.)
<snip>
I do share some of your sentiment that the current auto safety standards
haven't progressed as fast as other parts of the auto world. Especially
domestic auto manufactures who have followed more than lead for 3
decades. (followed regulations, followed insurance institute, followed
eurapean, etc)

But we should add to the above statement. While the G forces you mention
are obtainable, they are only there for fractions of a second. A crumple
zone allows us to spread out the G forces over time and reduce the peak
absolute value. The irony of some of those tests is they are vehicle
against immutable object. Normally we hit something that also deforms.
Some of the tests are that way on purpose to isolate testing interactions.

It is the dissipation of energy that matters. That is why the race car
that swerves into the wall and just stops unspectaculary kills the
driver and the race car that flips rolls and slides taking all that time
to dissipate the energy, spares the driver.

Something I would like to see, and I have seen this used in amature road
racing, is a dual seatbelt system. (this is in my ultimate EV car
design) a center roof mounted pod contains a second retractor and the
seatbelt crosses the chest the other way and clips at the left hip
(driver).  I have not  devised a slick way of doing this yet. This would
help keep a person's torso straight in a wreck and help prevent sliding
out from under the belt in side impacts.

I got in a wreck in 1990 in which a cop was chasing someone at high
speed. The intersection was blind and the light was green and as I went
through the intersection the guy in the monti-carlo ran the red light at
80+ and hit the front left corner of my mitsu pu. It was kind of a equal
angle impact which pushed the monti-carlo a lane over and pretty much
stopped me in about 5 feet. The cop had to slam on his brakes and almost
broadsided me. My body moved forward and hit the belt, but because of
single angle across the chest, my upper body pivoted on the belt
damaging my back and my chin hit my left bicep and I watched my glasses
fly out the window and into the street.  If there were a pair of belts,
this would be minimized.

I have 4" 5 point belts in there now, cause I was racing it. I use to
drive daily with those (4 point) cause the others didn't work well with
the race seat and I can say they are inconvenient enough that people
wouldn't used them and they have a degree of unsafety as you can't look
over your shoulder as easily. So I think dual retractors and a criss
cross is a good compromise (and works well for the "better half" of the
market too)

I also know the degree of belt stretch is important and the load area. I
think the simplest and best first safety set would be to have the car
manufactures be required to bump up the belt weave thickness and widen
the belts a 1/2" to an inch.

And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
conversation, They do not inflate the way hollywood depics it, they
deflate immediately. So if you are on the highway and get in a multi-car
pileup, the first impact where both you and the other guy were just
doing 70 deploys the airbag, but you are still doing 45mph the next
impact  when you both plow into the simi rig on it's side, gets you.

An airbag can only deploy once! (pst, how many race cars have airbags,
if they are such a great idea)


_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Seth Rothenberg

Re: Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
>
> And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
> conversation, They do not inflate the way hollywood depics it, they
> deflate immediately. So if you are on the highway and get in a multi-car
> pileup, the first impact where both you and the other guy were just
> doing 70 deploys the airbag, but you are still doing 45mph the next
> impact  when you both plow into the simi rig on it's side, gets you.


Jeff,
You didn't mention that the airbag is likely to break an arm
in the process.   If/when my Camry passes inspection,
I'm thinking in terms of replacing the seat with a racing seat,
in hopes of getting better support....
and expecting it will have a 5-point harness.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20090706/e16cf0f2/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Thor Johnson

Re: Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jeff Shanab
>I have 4" 5 point belts in there now, cause I was racing it. I use to
>drive daily with those (4 point) cause the others didn't work well with
>the race seat and I can say they are inconvenient enough that people
>wouldn't used them and they have a degree of unsafety as you can't look
>over your shoulder as easily. So I think dual retractors and a criss
>cross is a good compromise (and works well for the "better half" of the
>market too)

I've autocrossed a bit, and running a CamLock is 2nd nature to me, and
the latch-link doesn't seem too bad either, but I think I'll use it as a
4 point in my street rod.  I've been debating about a 4 point, upper
belts going to the seat, or just living dangerously with a lapbelt --
the car is a convertible and there's no place where I can really attach
shoulder belts [especially since all of the seats are small; I'm worried
about spinal compression with the seat idea].  The seats (from a Geo
Tracker) are also small, but they look perfect with the vehicle; if I
put the belts to the seats, they'll be anchored nearly 3 inches below my
shoulders :(.

If I install a roll-hoop, I'll have a place, but the actual body comes
up to nipple-height on me.

http://thormj.dreamhosters.com/bluegoose/ is it's old home, but I
haven't
updated it in ages; moving to dreamhost broke the photo album and other
things.  When I get some time, I'll replace all that cruft (esp since
it's not even close to relevant any more).

>And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
>conversation, They do not inflate the way hollywood depics it, they
>deflate immediately. So if you are on the highway and get in a
multi-car >pileup, the first impact where both you and the other guy
were just doing >70 deploys the airbag, but you are still doing 45mph
the next impact  when >you both plow into the simi rig on it's side,
gets you.

>An airbag can only deploy once! (pst, how many race cars have airbags,
>if they are such a great idea)

Agreed.  For impacts against stationary objects (stunt car, car runs
into wall/tree at speed), they are a godsend, but for crashes up having
3 or more cars... yeesh.  You also usually come out with burns from the
explosives.  The best thing for safety would be a 4,5, or 6 point
harness and deeper seats (so you can't "fall out" of the sides), but
after dealing with the "automatic seatbelt fiasco," I don't think I want
the car companies to play (imagine an automatic antisubmarine belt gone
wrong :O).



_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Ben-149

Re: Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
On Jul 6, 2009 5:17 PM, "Thor Johnson" <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>I have 4" 5 point belts in there now, cause I was racing it. I use to
>drive daily with those (4 po...
I've autocrossed a bit, and running a CamLock is 2nd nature to me, and
the latch-link doesn't seem too bad either, but I think I'll use it as a
4 point in my street rod.  I've been debating about a 4 point, upper
belts going to the seat, or just living dangerously with a lapbelt --
the car is a convertible and there's no place where I can really attach
shoulder belts [especially since all of the seats are small; I'm worried
about spinal compression with the seat idea].  The seats (from a Geo
Tracker) are also small, but they look perfect with the vehicle; if I
put the belts to the seats, they'll be anchored nearly 3 inches below my
shoulders :(.

If I install a roll-hoop, I'll have a place, but the actual body comes
up to nipple-height on me.

http://thormj.dreamhosters.com/bluegoose/ is it's old home, but I
haven't
updated it in ages; moving to dreamhost broke the photo album and other
things.  When I get some time, I'll replace all that cruft (esp since
it's not even close to relevant any more).

>And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
>conversation, They do not inflate ...
Agreed.  For impacts against stationary objects (stunt car, car runs
into wall/tree at speed), they are a godsend, but for crashes up having
3 or more cars... yeesh.  You also usually come out with burns from the
explosives.  The best thing for safety would be a 4,5, or 6 point
harness and deeper seats (so you can't "fall out" of the sides), but
after dealing with the "automatic seatbelt fiasco," I don't think I want
the car companies to play (imagine an automatic antisubmarine belt gone
wrong :O).

_______________________________________________ General EVDL support:
http://evdl.org/help/ Usage...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20090706/45c037e6/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Ben-149

Re: Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
Sorry, please ignore.. fat fingered my phone and accidently replied.

On Jul 6, 2009 6:38 PM, "Ben" <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Jul 6, 2009 5:17 PM, "Thor Johnson" <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>I have 4" 5 point belts in there now, cause I was racing it. I use to
>drive daily with those (4 po...

> > I've autocrossed a bit, and running a CamLock is 2nd nature to me, and >
the latch-link doesn't...

>And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
>conversation, They do not inflate ...

> > Agreed.  For impacts against stationary objects (stunt car, car runs >
into wall/tree at speed)...

_______________________________________________ General EVDL support:
http://evdl.org/help/ Usage...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20090706/656f012c/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev

Jeff Shanab

Re: Why not drop the other shoe and have an all electric volt?

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
In reply to this post by Jeff Shanab
I hope I don't get nailed for veering off topic, safety is never off-topic.

There are some other problems with airbags, but they are still a good
thing in general. Just need to squelch the "false sense of security"
that the media crams down our throats.

Most people use their airbag wrong. They set the steering wheel at the
angle that is perpendicular to our line of site if you were looking at
it.  This is historical, the non airbagged columns were all at this
angle. But if you check all the instructions and certainly the
instructions for the test (I researched crash testing for a while), the
proper setup is for it to face the chest.
If you think about it,  that makes sense, closer to center of mass.

Badly faceing airbag is even more severe if you are where glasses in a
10 year old American car. The lenses can be popped out and can damage
your eyes.

There are many generations of airbags. US air bags have notoriously been
overkill at 200mph deployment and a big charge. The design was around a
6-foot-1, 175lb male.

Now there are 4-6 squibs in a multi-zoned charge and a combination goes
off depending on speed, degree of impact and even sometimes, a weight
sensor in the seat. (BTW, people have been injured replacing deployed
airbags cause they didn't realize there is more than 1 charge in them)

Now everyone go and adjust their steering column next time they get in
the car, the recommended position feels odd.

>> >
>> > And for those who would bring up air-bags at this point of the
>> > conversation, They do not inflate the way hollywood depics it, they
>> > deflate immediately. So if you are on the highway and get in a multi-car
>> > pileup, the first impact where both you and the other guy were just
>> > doing 70 deploys the airbag, but you are still doing 45mph the next
>> > impact  when you both plow into the simi rig on it's side, gets you.
>>    
>
>
> Jeff,
> You didn't mention that the airbag is likely to break an arm
> in the process.   If/when my Camry passes inspection,
> I'm thinking in terms of replacing the seat with a racing seat,
> in hopes of getting better support....
> and expecting it will have a 5-point harness.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/private/ev/attachments/20090706/e16cf0f2/attachment.html 
>
>  

_______________________________________________
General EVDL support: http://evdl.org/help/
Usage guidelines: http://evdl.org/help/index.html#conv
Archives: http://evdl.org/archive/
Subscription options: http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/ev