[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773901#action_12773901 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3153:
----------------------------------------
Hi Erwan,
These are good questions
>why naming a relation with the name of the related entity ?
I just picked that name by analogy with what is just above : Country/countryGeoId, ... PostalCode/postalCodeGeoId. Is there a problem with that ?
>why naming a relation with a space in it ?
Yes good question, I guess it should not have one, not sure it's a problem though... Did you try ? BTW we have the same for Facility entity.
And, usually, naming a relation is used when there is more than one relation to another entity, like from/to or parent/child
OK, it's a bit convoluted and scifi for now, but consider that our geopoints have an elevation attribute. So a postal address may have many geopoints (at least in the future...)
> Relation title not needed on Facility entity
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3153
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3153> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-3153.diff
>
>
> the title Geo Point is not needed on the entity Facility as there is only one relation to GeoPoint
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
