new plugin

6 messages

new plugin

Reply Threaded

Hello everybody.

I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
hudson plugin :
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin

thanks for this wonderfull tool !!

--
Bertrand Gressier

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

Re: new plugin

Reply Threaded

Bertrand Gressier wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
> hudson plugin :
> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin
>
> thanks for this wonderfull tool !!

Thanks for the plugin.

Is there any reason this behavior shouldn't be in the default? I mean,
if someone is allowed to create a job, I'd imagine the said person
should be automatically allowed to configure the job.

--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/

smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment

Mike Rooney-5

Re: new plugin

Reply Threaded

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Bertrand Gressier wrote:
>> Hello everybody.
>>
>> I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
>> hudson plugin :
>> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin
>>
>> thanks for this wonderfull tool !!
>
> Thanks for the plugin.
>
> Is there any reason this behavior shouldn't be in the default? I mean,
> if someone is allowed to create a job, I'd imagine the said person
> should be automatically allowed to configure the job.
>

Yeah, I was thinking that too, this plug-in on the surface sounds like
good default behavior.

--
Michael Rooney
[hidden email]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Bertrand Gressier-2

Re: new plugin

Reply Threaded

Thanks,

Indeed, I also thought that this behavior shouldn't be in the default.

I have a request, to create this plugin, I call the protected method
"add" of AuthorizationMatrixProperty object and it's bad.
I have modified method's definition with reflexion. I've tried to
extend it and others things but nothing works

do you have a better solution ?

Bertrand

2009/10/17 Mike Rooney <[hidden email]>:

> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Bertrand Gressier wrote:
>>> Hello everybody.
>>>
>>> I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
>>> hudson plugin :
>>> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin
>>>
>>> thanks for this wonderfull tool !!
>>
>> Thanks for the plugin.
>>
>> Is there any reason this behavior shouldn't be in the default? I mean,
>> if someone is allowed to create a job, I'd imagine the said person
>> should be automatically allowed to configure the job.
>>
>
> Yeah, I was thinking that too, this plug-in on the surface sounds like
> good default behavior.
>
> --
> Michael Rooney
> [hidden email]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>

--
Bertrand Gressier
27 rue Louis Montois
59790 Ronchin
06 09 62 92 48

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

Re: new plugin

Reply Threaded

Bertrand Gressier wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Indeed, I also thought that this behavior shouldn't be in the default.
>
> I have a request, to create this plugin, I call the protected method
> "add" of AuthorizationMatrixProperty object and it's bad.
> I have modified method's definition with reflexion. I've tried to
> extend it and others things but nothing works

Because of the concurrency, I don't want to let you change it. But I
modified the code so that you can create a new instance with modified
set of permissions.

>
> do you have a better solution ?
>
> Bertrand
>
>
> 2009/10/17 Mike Rooney <[hidden email]>:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Bertrand Gressier wrote:
>>>> Hello everybody.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
>>>> hudson plugin :
>>>> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin
>>>>
>>>> thanks for this wonderfull tool !!
>>>
>>> Thanks for the plugin.
>>>
>>> Is there any reason this behavior shouldn't be in the default? I mean,
>>> if someone is allowed to create a job, I'd imagine the said person
>>> should be automatically allowed to configure the job.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I was thinking that too, this plug-in on the surface sounds like
>> good default behavior.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Rooney
>> [hidden email]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>
>
>

--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/

smime.p7s (4K) Download Attachment

Bertrand Gressier-2

Re: new plugin

Reply Threaded

Hello,

Well, it's ok when I create a new job, but if you used Template
plugin, it doesn't work because AuthorizationMatrixProperty exists yet
in the properties list.

We can't append a synchronize method ?

Else I must remove object of properties list and recreates it ?

thank you !!

2009/10/29 Kohsuke Kawaguchi <[hidden email]>:

> Bertrand Gressier wrote:
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Indeed, I also thought that this behavior shouldn't be in the default.
>>
>> I have a request, to create this plugin, I call the protected method
>> "add" of AuthorizationMatrixProperty object and it's bad.
>> I have modified method's definition with reflexion. I've tried to
>> extend it and others things but nothing works
>
> Because of the concurrency, I don't want to let you change it. But I
> modified the code so that you can create a new instance with modified
> set of permissions.
>
>>
>> do you have a better solution ?
>>
>> Bertrand
>>
>>
>> 2009/10/17 Mike Rooney <[hidden email]>:
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Bertrand Gressier wrote:
>>>>> Hello everybody.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if I can, but I informed to you that I published my first
>>>>> hudson plugin :
>>>>> http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Create+Job+Advanced+Plugin
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for this wonderfull tool !!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the plugin.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any reason this behavior shouldn't be in the default? I mean,
>>>> if someone is allowed to create a job, I'd imagine the said person
>>>> should be automatically allowed to configure the job.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I was thinking that too, this plug-in on the surface sounds like
>>> good default behavior.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Rooney
>>> [hidden email]
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> Sun Microsystems http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/
>