re: Spoon planning (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")

2 messages Options
Embed this post
Permalink
Craig Latta

re: Spoon planning (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink

Hi Janko--

> When Spoon will be ready and proven on few battlefields, then will be
> a time for a switch.

     Can you be more specific? I'd like to know how you (all) define
success, in terms concrete enough for planning. I suspect "I'll know it
when I see it" doesn't suffice. :)


     thanks,

-C

--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
www.netjam.org
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]

_______________________________________________
Spoon mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spoon
Chris Muller-3

Re: Spoon planning (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")

Reply Threaded More More options
Print post
Permalink
I'd like to start with a very minimal image, a 3.8 or 3.9 "master"
image, and see if Magma's test suite can run in the minimal, having
pulled over methods dynamically.  (And very curious as to the final
size and contents of that minimal image!).

On 7/4/07, Craig Latta <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Hi Janko--
>
> > When Spoon will be ready and proven on few battlefields, then will be
> > a time for a switch.
>
>      Can you be more specific? I'd like to know how you (all) define
> success, in terms concrete enough for planning. I suspect "I'll know it
> when I see it" doesn't suffice. :)
>
>
>      thanks,
>
> -C
>
> --
> Craig Latta
> improvisational musical informaticist
> www.netjam.org
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spoon mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spoon
>
_______________________________________________
Spoon mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spoon